CRT tube or adapted to the needs of viewers for several decades. Plasma and LCD came in recent years, more competitors for disability television buyers. These newer entrants to offer slim design and ability to enjoy a theatrical experience with enormous screens that do not require the entire room settings.
For millions of consumers are still buying new plasma or LCD television, despite falling prices in recent years will, of course, other technologies are being developed in the not so distant future, a complicating factor in the decision when choosing a new set. To get acquainted with at least the names of various technologies on the horizon may help prepare buyers for what is sure to follow in a crowded market.
OLED
OLED stands for organic light-emitting diode. This technology was originally developed years ago, Eastman Kodak and is used for both light sources and television. Sony is one of several companies in the hope of this technology on the market. Images are produced through the electro-phosphorescent properties of certain organic materials. No tail lights, you must have an OLED TV. In addition to television, OLED can be applied to small screens such as mobile phones, MP3 players and digital cameras.
On OLED-TV (active-matrix) will use less energy than the average LCD TV. Offer greater range of colors and lighting, as well as a broader perspective. These televisions are lighter weight, thinner and more durable. The most important input in the OLED TV at this early stage of their lives. The life of one of LEDs (blue folder) is only in 3000 to 5000 hours at the moment. If the production technology are made, it is assumed that OLED TVs have a much more competitive life.
SED
SED is a surface conduction electron-emitter display, which is the technology which alleged Toshiba and Canon. SED uses electron emitter for each dot to light on the phosphors on the screen and works as a CRT screen. Unlike CRT television, however, SED provides a much thinner and flatter screen.
SED television to say that the long working life, while only 10% reduction of the polluters after 60,000 hours. They use much less energy than traditional LCD and plasma screen and an excellent ratio of the contrast and brightness. In contrast to the LCD TV, the SED had no experience (blurring in fast action scenes) and provides a 180 degrees angle. Like the early plasma, however, contains an SED television is a risk of burn in.
Laser-based TV
Mitsubishi may be revealing its new laser-based HDTV models at the end of the year.
The television is a slimmed-down rear projection model that will reportedly rival space-saving design of plasma and LCD screens. He says he is only 10 “deep, which do not impose too much in every room. It is also expected to be lighter in weight, partly because of their lightweight plastic screen versus traditional glass.
According to the manufacturer, other attractive features include improving the quality of the image. These sets are said to improve the content and the color black blacker than existing technology. Moreover, the new laser-based television messages consumes much less energy and is expected to be much lower than the price that similar large plasma or LCD screens.
FED
Another potential leader for the future is FED (field emission display). Sony is currently in the FED push.
FED television is supposed to act as a CRT set, but offers a flatter, thinner, such as LCD and plasma. The use of more efficient transmitter (carbon nanotubes), and can thus create an image of higher resolution than an LCD, use significantly less power than plasma screens and can move quickly without blurring.
The good news is that the evolution of television technologies should present some options with a fantastic view and yet affordable for the average consumer. Only time will tell which technologies will actually come on the market and whether or not actual performance will match current expectations.
December 27th, 2008 on 5:09 pm
yes, it's not enough to have a better view, its price should be affordable. Hopefully this new technology would match our expectations.
Does this technology have limited life like in plasma?